
Critical Interculturality and CALL in English Language Teaching: A ten-year revision of research in Colombia
Revista Unimar Revista Unimar Julio-diciembre 2025Julio-diciembre 2025
e-ISSN: 2216-0116e-ISSN: 2216-0116 ISSN: 0120-4327ISSN: 0120-4327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31948/rev.unimarDOI: https://doi.org/10.31948/rev.unimar
Rev. UnimarRev. Unimar Vol. 43 No. 2 pp. 121-142Vol. 43 No. 2 pp. 121-142
125 Andrés Mauricio Potes-Morales
The second type, functional interculturality,
aims to promote tolerance, recognition,
dialogue, diversity, and cultural difference
(Tubino, 2005). However, despite its intentions,
this perspective is often driven by neoliberal
agendas and fails to address the underlying
causes of social and cultural divides. Effective
cultural dialogue must incorporate critical
factors missing from the relational perspective:
Social, economic, political, and epistemological
dimensions (Walsh, 2010).
The third type, Critical Interculturality (CI),
differs significantly from the previous two
categories in that it addresses structural,
colonial, and racial issues impacting society, the
economy, politics, and academia (Walsh, 2010).
CI is a tool, process, and project developed
by marginalized individuals within the social
hierarchy. This contrasts with the top-down
nature of functional interculturality. CI aims to
transform social and institutional structures by
creating new ways of being, thinking, knowing,
learning, and living. CI moves beyond merely
recognizing and incorporating ‘difference’ into
existing structures. It demands political agency
and action to foster genuine transformation.
This aligns with Freire´s, (1987) notion
that genuine transformation stems from
individuals developing a consciousness through
communal engagement. This consciousness
leads to political action that supports the
emancipation of oppressed and marginalized
individuals. Freire posits that education
should be inherently political to effect societal
transformation, a principle that is central to
CI. In the Latin American context, Perales
(2013) found that engaging students in close
analysis of ideologically charged texts fosters
awareness of multiple positions within a cultural
context. This process also prompts reflection
on culturally rooted assumptions that shape
interpretations. This approach aligns with the
transformative aims of critical interculturality
in ELT. ELT from an intercultural perspective,
in this context, is rooted in critical pedagogies
and reflects a significant evolution in the Global
South, including Colombia (Granados-Beltrán,
2016; Restrepo & Rojas, 2010; Tubino, 2005;
Usma et al., 2018; Walsh, 2010).
Integrating technology in language
learning: The role of CALL
Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL)
is a significant field within language education,
distinguished by the unique requirements for
teaching languages with computer technology
(Levy & Hubbard, 2005). CALL is a subset
of applied linguistics that focuses on using
computer technology to facilitate language
teaching and learning. It is important to
understand what is meant by ‘computer
technology’. According to Techopedia (2024),
computers are machines that perform
processes, calculations, and operations based
on instructions from software or hardware
programs. This definition includes a range
of smart devices, including smartphones,
tablets, laptops, and smart TVs (Beatty, 2010;
Chapelle & Jamieson, 2008; Techopedia, 2024).
Consequently, CALL is language teaching
through any computer-like device.
Levy and Hubbard (2005) emphasize that the
term CALL is widely accepted in language
education for two main reasons. First,
language learning is different from other
subjects and requires a specialized approach
when taught through technology. Second,
CALL has long been validated within the
global academic community. It has formed the
foundation of numerous journals and research
organizations, including the CALL Journal,
the ReCALL Journal, the CALICO Journal,
the JALTCALL Journal (Japan Association of
Language Teachers CALL Interest Group), the
APACALL Journal (Asia Pacific Association for
CALL), and the PacCALL Journal (Pacific CALL
Association), among others.
In contemporary settings, various terms are
used to describe the technologies and devices
employed in language education. These include
Technology Enhanced Language Learning
(TELL) (Casanovas, 2002), Computer Mediated
Communication (CMC), Integrated Learning
Systems (ILS) (Blyth, 2008), Mobile English
Language Learning (MELL) (Elaish et al., 2019),
Social Networking Sites for Language Learning
(SNSLL) (Álvarez-Valencia & Fernández-
Benavides, 2019), Network-Based Language
Teaching (NBLT), and Emergency Remote