
Association of academic reading skills and the meta-comprehension process in rural students
30 Hansel Fernando Rodríguez Gómez
Revista Unimar Revista Unimar Julio-diciembre 2025Julio-diciembre 2025
e-ISSN: 2216-0116e-ISSN: 2216-0116 ISSN: 0120-4327ISSN: 0120-4327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31948/rev.unimarDOI: https://doi.org/10.31948/rev.unimar
Rev. UnimarRev. Unimar Vol. 43 No. 2 pp. 27-43Vol. 43 No. 2 pp. 27-43
of the evaluated population (ICFES, 2018).
Similarly, the National Report on Results for
Colombia PISA 2018 (ICFES, 2020b) reveals that
Colombia’s average score is 412 points. This falls
short of the average scores of OECD and non-
OECD countries, which are 487 and 496 points,
respectively.
The difficulty in developing academic reading
skills may be greater in rural classrooms,
as noted by Arias (2017), due to systemic
deficiencies in this context. Research on the
subject highlights the concerns of teachers
and other groups, ultimately leading to the
development of strategies to improve the
situation. Ochoa and Aragón (2005) state that
teaching metacognitive strategies in a natural
classroom setting can promote metacognitive
development and improve the reading process,
particularly in rural areas.
On the other hand, metacognition in
reading comprehension is referred to as
metacomprehension, which is defined as the
reader’s knowledge of their comprehension.
It is an instant awareness of how reading is
perceived and how it is utilized for learning.
Flavell (1987) distinguishes two processes of
metacognition to differentiate between what a
person knows and what they can do with that
knowledge. Flavell (1993) states: «We could
say that cognitive strategies are used to make
cognitive progress and that metacognitive
strategies are used to monitor that progress.
Monitoring one’s progress on a task is an
important metacognitive activity» (p. 160).
According to Soto et al. (2019), a key
characteristic of meta-understanding is its
positive impact on student performance. Unlike
Solé (1997) and Díaz-Barriga and Hernández
(2002), who consider prior knowledge a pillar of
reading comprehension, Soto et al. (2019) argue
that reading strategies can help readers with
limited prior knowledge use logic and common
sense to fill in conceptual gaps. Metacognitive
knowledge relates to the transfer of learning,
meaning that the knowledge acquired can
be applied in contexts other than where it
was originally learned. This concept is gaining
popularity in active pedagogy as the final stage
of the teaching and learning process.
Due to its significance in the theory of
metacognition and reading comprehension in
educational settings, research with a timeframe
greater than seven years was necessary to
understand the background of the subject of
study. Although these issues have been relevant
since the early 20th century, recent research,
motivated by concerns about academic
performance in elementary and secondary
education, has focused on metacognitive
strategies for improving reading comprehension,
which address health, cognitive, and social
aspects to identify practical solutions.
Bolaños and Gómez (2015), Santiago et al.
(2009), and Blasco and Allueva (2010) point out
the difficulty of reading comprehension among
school-aged children and attribute it to the
underdevelopment of metacognitive strategies
at this stage. These authors agree that an
absence of solid academic reading skills can
lead to academic failure, emphasizing the need
to integrate metacognitive development into
the curriculum as a fundamental component of
student training.
According to a study by Rodríguez et al.
(2016), an absence of metacognitive strategies
developed during schooling leads to persistent
reading difficulties and increases the disparity
between students of different performance
levels. The authors suggest that these
metacomprehension strategies can be based
on Vygotsky’s theory of the zone of proximal
development, which they consider fundamental
to developing the reading process.
On the other hand, Berrocal and Ramírez
(2019) and Edossa et al. (2019) disagree
on the significance of age in developing
metacomprehension, although brain maturation
influences skills, including reading performance.
These authors agree with Rodríguez et al. (2016)
that the lack of intervention with metacognitive
strategies exacerbates inequality in reading
self-regulation.
Soto et al. (2019) found that accuracy and
planning (variables in the reading awareness
scale) improve the inference process, supporting
the hypothesis that greater awareness of the
reading process is linked to higher comprehension.