The game: a didactic strategy to strengthen the reading process
79
Maira Esther Arrieta Mier
Juana Judith Mieles Palacín
Gustavo Adolfo González Roys
Revista Criterios - 30 (1) January-Juny 2023 Rev. Criterios - pp. 65-81
ISSN: 0121-8670, ISSN Electrónico: 2256-1161
https://doi.org/10.31948/rev.criterios
Universidad Mariana, San Juan de Pasto, Nariño, Colombia.
Likewise, “respect for their desire to play,
invent, and create is one of the fundamental
elements from which any education based on
respect for the interests and characteristics
of the child must start” (Aquino and Sanchez,
1999, p. 64), so the students of course 5-2
had as a basis the various activities presented
to have the opportunity to interact with other
classmates and rearm the socio-aective
relationships with them through play and the
established didactics.
What characterizes the implementation
of the game to strengthen the reading
process of students of 5-2? During this
phase of data collection, through the eld diary,
the teacher recorded each of the events that
took place in the classroom, whose students’
impressions of each of the proposed activities
were a fundamental piece of the research
exercise since, as Bonilla-Castro and Rodriguez
(2005) argue, “the eld diary can be a key
resource that allows the researcher to have
control over the process of scientic inquiry”
(p. 244). Thus, important categories such as
reading, motivation, student participation, and
comprehension emerged as a result of these
research records.
It is important to emphasize that the reading
process of the students of course 5-2 had a
growing development throughout this research,
because although in the rst sessions, they
were self-conscious and less participative,
with each session they felt more condent to
read aloud and much more familiar with the
interpretation of the texts, as evidenced by the
correct answers and uent readings.
Given this aspect, it is worth recalling
Barberousse-Alfonso and Vargas-Dengo
(2017), who express that:
Reading favors the creation of complex
thought structures for learning, language,
and communication. [...] one can discover
the world, reect and build a critical spirit to
play, expand the vocabulary, learn to think;
all reasons that justify the formation of the
habit of reading. (p. 130)
Thus, it can be armed that the students of
course 5-2 found in reading an additional space to
be able to communicate with their environment
(classmates, teachers, family), and to better
understand the world around them, through the
dierent types of texts. By nding a relationship
between the texts read and their context, they
were able to interpret them and assume reading
with much less diculty.
The process of comprehension and interpretation
of texts is a fundamental part of the results
shown by each of the students in course 5-2.
As could be observed in the analysis of results,
they showed diculties (especially in the rst
sessions) when interpreting at the inferential
and contextual levels, but not at the literal
level, where they showed great appropriation
of knowledge. Thus, Moreno et al. (2010)
refer to reading at textual, intertextual, and
contextual levels. Regarding the textual level, it
is observed that comprehension occurs through
the literal and alludes to basic meanings, so it
was very easy for them to solve questions in
this sense.
However, the intertextual level responds to
literal thinking: operations of classication,
seriation, etc., and inter-thematic, and it is
here where students showed confusion in
some cases, especially at the beginning of
the research, since interpretation is not linear,
but requires looking beyond the established,
detailing and rereading paragraphs to obtain
an answer. In addition, there is the contextual
level, which represents a real challenge for fth-
grade students, since it is a critical level, where
the creation of arguments and the resolution
of problems from the text are sought; it was
here where the teacher had to guide them to
solve the questions of this type; without her
guidance, they would not have achieved the
objective of the question.
How is the reading process developed
through games in reading situations as
a didactic strategy? In the identication
of reading, it was possible to evidence the
development of the reading process advanced
by the students of course 5-2 where, through
their experiences in the academic and personal
process, it was necessary to use the instrument
of the nal diagnosis to analyze the development
of the categories of reading and play, which
represent the fundamental axis of the research,
which were highlighted by the students.
According to the results, it can be inferred that
reading is now perceived by students as a less
complex skill and more related to meaningful